#Ibm t860 monitor install#
#Ibm t860 monitor Pc#
#Ibm t860 monitor plus#

The 18.1-inch screen comes right up against the edge of the case, which lets it fit into tight spaces and makes it one of the lightest units reviewed.At native 1,280- by 1,024-pixel resolution, color reproduction was excellent. Despite ghosting, the $700 monitor earned a B grade.The NEC MultiSync 1880SX is a good all-around display on a slim stand that adjusts vertically, tilted forward and backward, and reorients itself as a portrait monitor. When we closed a window, images often lingered in background for several minutes.

#Ibm t860 monitor install#

It took a little more trouble to install than the Gateway, but the menu buttons were better designed and easier to understand.Ghosting problems kept it from ranking with the Gateway or the Sony. But the cables were tough to install, and the DVD tests showed fuzzy, choppy images.As a budget monitor that won't be used for viewing video, the FPD1810 makes a great buy.The Atec Systems NeoView AL181 was close in quality to the Gateway and the least expensive monitor at only $700. A left-handed user might find this annoying.The 18.1-inch Gateway FPD1810, priced at a mere $1,000, has such impressive image quality that it received our second Bang for the Buck designation.It passed the ghosting test without difficulty and had a good, 160-degree viewing angle. But it can't tilt into portrait mode, nor can it rotate left and right because of the stand's design.The controls are well-designed, if in an unusual spot'the upper right. The SDM-S81 tied for first place with the Sharp in video quality. It displayed crisp images and reproduced vibrant colors well.

#Ibm t860 monitor plus#

One plus we especially like is a side power button as well as the usual front button.The 18-inch Sony MultiScan SDM-S81 is a great monitor at a great price of $1,000, easily clinching our Bang for the Buck designation.

A well-designed base and cable ports make for a solid structure and easy installation. It has a functional, 165-degree viewing angle in both portrait and landscape modes.Image quality was comparable to the Samsung's. The only drawback we found was that the 160-degree viewing angle dropped to 150 degrees in portrait mode.The 191T earned another Reviewer's Choice for excellent image quality and large viewing angle.The third highest grade went to the Sharp LL-T1820-B, which earned a solid A- and a Reviewer's Choice for the best video images.Reasonably priced at $1,299, the 18.1-inch portrait-capable LCD is an inch smaller than the Samsung. The buttons are well-spaced and easy to navigate. Its images looked spectacular, only a notch below the Eizo's, and it came in third for digital video quality.The $1,089 SyncMaster can tilt into portrait orientation, ideal for document study and Web page development.

#Ibm t860 monitor Pc#

The Eizo L685 earned a Reviewer's Choice designation and our highest score.The slightly larger, 19-inch Samsung SyncMaster 191T detected PC signals automatically and was overall the easiest to set up. They were the easiest of all to manipulate, although difficult to see against the black monitor. That has changed, and it was a pleasure to see another improvement: matte black menu buttons flush with the front panel. The L685 exhibited no ghosting and reproduced our complex color wheel with richer detail than most plasma monitors we've reviewed.In the past, Eizo LCDs have had cumbersome, attachable speakers. At $1,560, it was a little on the expensive side but worth it. We measured viewing angles with a protractor on a text screen to compare them with the marketing specifications.To test ghosting, we left a black image in an open window for three minutes, then closed the window and looked for ghostly vestiges on the bright white screen.Our overall grades factored in performance, price, ease of operation and form factor.The 18.1-inch Eizo L685 ranked at the top for perfect still images as well as digital video. Then we sent complex images to the monitors to compare color, depth and detail against the original images.We tested each monitor at its native resolution as well as at other resolutions to determine how well they could fill in the gaps at less than optimal resolution. We also examined them with short color DVD clips at varying levels of light and dark. Now, there's a plentiful market of such monitors priced around $1,000 apiece.The GCN Lab evaluated 12 high-end LCDs in that price range to see how well they reproduced bright color contrasts and text. Not so long ago, a large, space-saving LCD cost $2,000.